MaltaToday previous editions

MT 19 August 2018

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1016519

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 26 of 51

27 maltatoday | SUNDAY • 19 AUGUST 2018 AS rescue workers look for survivors in the concrete rubble that used to be part of the Morandi bridge in Genoa, Italian authorities are start- ing their investigation into the possible causes behind this terrible tragedy. It is too early to determine what may have caused the catastrophic collapse of more than 100 metres of the multi- span, cable-stayed suspension bridge, completed just over 50 years ago. But it's important to understand that bridge en- gineering does not end when construction finishes and traffic starts to flow. In fact, properly looking after a bridge during its long life is as crucial as having a good design, using high-quality materials, and ensuring sound workmanship during construction. Modern bridges are designed for a life of 100 years, though many centenarian bridges – such as the Forth Bridge in Scotland, which opened in 1890 – still provide sterling service, and of course there are smaller bridges built of stone to more ancient designs that have stood for many hundreds of years. Considering the num- ber of bridges built in Europe during the expansion of the motorway networks from the late-1950s onwards, we should expect, and be prepared for, many to exceed their planned lifespan in coming decades. Fa- cilitating this is ambitious but necessary, and made possible thanks only to regular inspec- tion and maintenance that ensures that building materials have not degraded, and that structural elements are fit to bear the traffic and environ- mental loads they face. So what are the factors that affect the strength of a bridge and may compromise public safety? Environment and climate The climate in a bridge's location, taken alongside at- mospheric pollution common in cities, can have an adverse influence on the material of the bridge – for example, the corrosion of steel reinforce- ment or pre-stressed steel tendons embedded in con- crete. Regular inspections are typically scheduled every six years for large bridges to iden- tify any degradation, and to take appropriate measures to replace cracking concrete and corroded steel, or to introduce protective coatings. In England, the Midlands Link motorway viaducts, com- prising 13 miles of elevated motorway carrying the M5 and M6 motorways around Birmingham, suffered from chloride-induced steel corro- sion early on in their life from exposure to salt used to de-ice the roads. This required an extensive application of cor- rosion protection measures in the early 1990s. More than 700 structures have benefited from this action, demonstrating the cost savings that can be made if appropriate action is taken at the right time. Stress and fatigue Fatigue caused by use is another factor, and inspec- tors will look out for tell-tale signs of failure often associ- ated with the cyclical stress produced by passing vehicles, particularly heavy trucks. This type of failure is especially relevant for metal bridge decks and the cables of suspension and cable-stayed bridges. Traffic has increased ever since these bridges were built, which inevitably leads to the need for more maintenance and strengthening work, such as additional steel, glass or carbon fibre-reinforced plates on critical parts in order to re- store or enhance their strength compared to what was deemed necessary during their design. For example, Network Rail in the UK used fibre-reinforced polymers to strengthen more than 20 bridges carrying high- way or railway traffic between 2001 and 2010. Consider how we all tend to react to a road sign bearing the words: "Essential Bridge Works – Expect Long Delays". One such situation prompted this comment from a member of the public: "We are doomed. I am going to buy a tent and pitch it outside work for the three months while the misery goes on." Perhaps knowing why this is necessary – and the consequences of not doing so – might persuade people to reconsider such views. Money and willingness to spend it Equally, we must understand that maintenance budgets need to be set at levels that far exceed those that would allow engineers only to "firefight" the most severe problems, as is becoming worryingly com- monplace. Instead, budgets need to allow for planned interventions and necessary upgrades over many decades. That requires public and government support, as well as skilled engineers committed to ensuring the safety of an age- ing structure. There are challenges in devising improved methods to assess bridge strength, devel- oping new repair techniques, and new ways of collecting and using inspection and monitor- ing data to provide advance warning of problems. These constantly push technological boundaries, making it possible to operate existing bridges safely during their long service lives. And the experience gained feeds into new designs that will become reality in years to come. Those investigating the col- lapse of the Morandi bridge will look at inspection and maintenance matters. Other lines of enquiry will no doubt include the unusual design of the multi-span bridge, with only a few cable stays to trans- fer deck loads to the towers, the ongoing work to shore up the foundations, and the heavy rainfall at the time of the collapse. In the shadow of this terrible loss of life, it is worth remembering that bridge in- spection and maintenance may be annoying for commuters – but it is crucial. Considering the number of bridges built in Europe during the expansion of the motorway networks from the late-1950s onwards, we should expect, and be prepared for, many to exceed their planned lifespan in coming decades Marios Chryssanthopoulos Marios Chryssanthopoulos is Professor of Structural Systems, University of Surrey TheConversation.eu Genoa bridge: a constant battle against traffic and decay

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MT 19 August 2018