Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1241994
maltatoday | WEDNESDAY • 29 APRIL 2020 Answers to the MaltaToday crossword will be published next Wednesday Weather Partly to rather cloudy with light rain overnight Visibility Good Wind Variable force 2 to 3 becoming Northeast force 3 to 4 and veering Northwest force 4 to 5 overnight Sea Slight TODAY TOMORROW Weather Crossword Across 1. Study of the structure of metals (13) 8. Musical entertainment (7) 10. Squeeze together (7) 12. Where two streets meet (6) 13. Salad sauce (8) 15. Contented (9) 18. Friendly (5) 21. Penniless (5) 22. Benefit (9) 27. Substantial (8) 29. Locomotive (6) 30. Voter (7) 31. Armed conflict (7) 33. Doctor of gynaecology (13) Down 2. Extract (7) 3. Disposed (3) 4. Swayed to and fro (6) 5. Capital of Vietnam (5) 6. Builds (6) 7. Unkempt (6) 9. Drifting (6) 11. Verge (4) 14. Stylish (5) 16. Diving bird (3) 17. Grecian architectural style (5) 19. Fall behind (3) 20. Photographic device (6) 21. Become sick (6) 23. Animal (4) 24. Creatures (7) 25. Grommet (6) 26. Previous to (6) 28. Destitute (5) 32. Floor covering (3) PARTLY CLOUDY UV: 7 SUNNY UV: 7 23 0 / 15 0 23 0 / 15 0 FEELS LIKE 23 0 FEELS LIKE 23 0 MATTHEW VELLA THE parents of a 20-year-old who had to be taken abroad for an urgent eye opera- tion abroad due to delay to be operated at Mater Dei Hospital, are insisting that they be compensated by the State for the expense incurred. The Ombudsman referred the complaint to the Commissioner for Health for investi- gation, after the parents said their son was diagnosed with an eye condition and need- ed surgery, but was unsuccessfully operated at Mater Dei Hospital with the result that he lost vision in one eye. The Commissioner for Health has insist- ed that the parents' request for the reim- bursement is legitimate. The parents were worried because the other eye was also giving cause for concern. The patient was being seen and followed up by ophthalmic surgeons both privately and at MDH, who decided that the patient should be operated and therefore, he was put on the waiting list. But a year had passed, and there was no response from MDH, and no date was giv- en for the operation. The parents decided to take their son to the UK, and to finance the procedure, they had to borrow money. The patient was operated in the UK and vi- sion was adequately maintained. The parents asked the Ombudsman to in- tervene to be refunded the costs related to the operation. The parents argued that de- lay from MDH part was increasing the risk for their son to lose his eyesight. The Department of Health stated that since the patient had chosen to travel to the UK for treatment privately, without obtain- ing authorisation to do so, they could not accept the request for reimbursement. The Commissioner for Health, who ana- lysed the complaint, said the decision was made because their son was risking losing his eyesight. The Department of Health stated that since the patient was due to be operated in Malta, there were no plans to refer the patient to the Treatment Abroad Commit- tee for consideration. The Department of Health reiterated their position and stated that since the patient went for the opera- tion to the UK, no follow up with MDH was reported from the patient's side. In his reaction, the Commissioner for Health stated that the statement that there was no follow-up from the patient's part following the operation in the UK is not correct since the patient was later sent for follow-up treatment through the govern- ment scheme. The Commissioner insisted that even though MDH promised the parents that the operation would be conducted in 'a few weeks', a year had passed, and no date was forthcoming from MDH. The Commis- sioner for Health insisted that the parents' request for the reimbursement is legitimate and made representations in this respect with the Ministry for Health from which he is still awaiting a reply. Parents who borrowed money for overseas operation, want State compensation