MaltaToday previous editions

MALTATODAY 7 February 2021

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1337056

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 47

2 maltatoday EXECUTIVE EDITOR Matthew Vella mvella@mediatoday.com.mt Letters to the Editor, MaltaToday, Vjal ir-Rihan, San Gwann SGN 9016 E-mail: dailynews@mediatoday.com.mt Letters must be concise, no pen names accepted, include full name and address maltatoday | SUNDAY • 7 FEBRUARY 2021 FIAU must be supported by lawmakers Editorial IT was a surprise to see finance minister Clyde Caruana and shadow finance minister Mario De Marco in appar- ent agreement over the scale of fines from the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) that are 'worrying' the financial services industry. Rather than valuing an FIAU that carries out its work without fear or favour, both parties are now echoing the concerns of financial ser- vices practitioners who have been left smarting over the aggressive nature of the fines contemplated by Maltese law. Indeed, Caruana has confirmed that he will carry out a review of the policy by which fines are imposed by regulatory authorities. The backlash against the FIAU by some other 'crit- ics' who should know better – but whose friends in the financial services industry are too hard to shake off – is simply symptomatic of the national hypocrisy that dominates such a debate. The complaint by the indus- try is that now with increased manpower at the FIAU, the agency is attempting to impress decision-makers at Moneyval of its zealous fight against money laundering. To prop up certain opportunist criticism of the FI- AU is simply giving support to the companies against which suspicious transaction reports are filed against and which are inspected by the FIAU. These companies have a right to appeal these fines, but to claim the FIAU is carrying out a witch-hunt over the impending Mon- eyval assessment, is simply a smokescreen intended to alienate the public from their own activities: a case in point was one luxury credit card provider, which re- cently recruited former Labour minister Chris Cardo- na, whose €373,000 FIAU fine was in part based on one client being a high-risk PEP due to adverse media links over ties to the Russian mafia. Understandably, the on- boarding of new clients is a process fraught with risk; one never knows what a client might eventually do in actions that eventually will reflect on their financial ser- vices providers. But to criticise the FIAU for carrying out its job is throwing the baby out with the bath-water, a non-starter. The effective deterrent of the fines, so essential in any regime that must enforce the respect of anti-mon- ey laundering rules, is not only being challenged in the tribunals and courts by the industry, but is now being criticised by politicians, with these complaints filtering down to the press. The accusation is that the FIAU's in- action for years (a situation predating Labour's election but which intensified in the Panama Papers scandal and the subsequent revelations concerning Yorgen Fenech, Electrogas, and Keith Schembri) is now being reversed with sheer determination. And despite the necessity of this exercise, it has left financial services practitioners concerned at the new reality. The FIAU has already dismissed this view as being entirely unfounded – indeed, it is unfathomable that the media kowtows to such an opinion which does a disservice to civil service workers and investigators are tasked with such an important job. The pressure from the European Commission and the Council of Europe in the last years, effectively contributed to the allocation of increased budgets over recent years, which allowed for increased recruitment, investment in technology and training to enable the FIAU to perform its role as it is expected to. Additionally, the latest round of the CoE's Money- val's mutual evaluation report recommended that the FIAU undertake a series of reforms that are now nec- essary for Malta to avoid its possible greylisting in the FATF, the Financial Action Task Force, towards mid- 2021. This listing would mean that Malta is placed on a list of "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring" due to deficiencies in their Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Funding of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regimes. A greylisting will make financial business in Malta more challenging and a costly affair, and in the run-up to this appointment with destiny, the FIAU has invested in the process that is necessary to bring Malta in line with Moneyval recommendations. Even simply dismissing recent actions by the FIAU as being a 'PR exercise' after years of inaction, betrays a long, and mistaken, tradition of extreme confidentiality inside the agency (the power to publish administrative sanctions was actually introduced in February 2015, and then only those which were not under appeal). The heavier fines are also the result of legal changes in 2018 that allowed for heavier penalties to be imposed, increasing more a maximum €12,500 in 2008 to €46,500 in 2014, and now €1 million for non-financial business and professions and even €5,000,000 for financial ser- vices operators. Some suggestions for reform appear to be pointing the two parties to agree that offending practitioners and in- stitutions should only be fined according to benchmarks of turnover or revenues; although it has to be said that, firms that appear innocuous in size can be processing millions in transactions only to be left with a small por- tion of income from their services, an ideal setting for those who seek the covert compliance of errant prac- titioners. But lawmakers should not lose focus of the fight against money laundering and its role in aiding organised crimi- nality in Malta and abroad. The government has already missed the chance to hit hard at organised crime with an unexplained wealth order. Now is the time to sup- port the FIAU in its onerous mission to supervise and investigate suspicious transactions and AML shortcom- ings in Malta. 31 January 2011 Ministry admits irregularities in Dar Malta salaries THE foreign ministry has admitted to irregular- ities in the way it was paying non-Maltese na- tionals employed at the Permanent Representa- tion, as alleged by Belgian national newspaper Le Soir this week. According to documents seen by MaltaTo- day, for years several employees had their low salaries 'topped up' with fringe benefits while being paid salaries without any tax or social security deducted at source. Employees concerned at what the Permanent Representation was declaring to the tax author- ities told this newspaper that they risked com- promising their pensions. Annual returns seen by MaltaToday show an- nual gross salaries for the employees were sever- al thousands of euros lower than their actual net salaries, because the Permanent Representation adopted a system of 'deductible allowances'. But the employees claim these fringe benefits are simply 'en noir' – undeclared allowances – as evidenced by the absence of paid overtime, which must be taxed, in their annual returns. The employees also complained their over- time had not been refunded or recuperated at 150% of the hours worked as according to Bel- gian law. The ministry this week claimed the irregular conditions had been introduced back in 1997 but that it was now accelerating their "phas- ing-out". "Engaged personnel with the Embassy and the Permanent Representation of Malta are now in line with Belgian law… Certain elements of these conditions had started to be phased out as from 1 January 2006on instructions from the Permanent Representative," the ministry said. There are 13 non-Maltese nationals em- ployed with the Permanent Representation, namely eight secretaries, three drivers, and two cleaners. Le Soir claimed 'tens of thousands' of euros in Belgian taxes "are passing undeclared to the authorities". This is how Le Soir described the situation: "During most months, the net salary is higher than the gross by some hundreds of euros, but all in all remaining relatively low at €1,200 net. This is thanks to certain 'deductible allowances' that are nothing else but undeclared payments. ... Quote of the Week "I feared he (Yorgen Fenech) would poison me. I was scared of everything coming from him." Melvin Theuma, the presumed middleman in the Daphne Caruana Galizia murder during the compilation of evidence against Yorgen Fenech MaltaToday 10 years ago

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MALTATODAY 7 February 2021