Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1470876
15 maltatoday | WEDNESDAY • 15 JUNE 2022 EUROPE Crunch time for Ukraine's EU aspirations BEING granted 'applicant status with conditions' is probably the best that Ukraine can hope for at next week's meeting of the European Council. It's not ideal, but if it offers the country a clear timeline and framework for full EU membership, it can be spun as a victory. Ukraine will learn by the end of June, probably as soon as the next European Council meet- ing on June 23-24 in Brussels, whether or not it has a clear path towards membership of the European Union. This past weekend, on a visit to Kyiv (her second such trip since Russia launched its full- scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24), European Com- mission President Ursula von der Leyen dropped the biggest hint yet that Ukraine is likely to get the green light for can- didate status, at least from the Commission. "We want to support Ukraine on its European journey," said von der Leyen on June 11 at a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volody- myr Zelensky, who has long suggested the EU use a special procedure to grant Ukraine im- mediate membership of the bloc – something that is highly un- likely to happen given that there is currently no such thing as a fast-track to EU membership. It would take years for Brussels, whose bureaucracy is notorious- ly unwieldy, to create one, even if it had the political will to do so. Candidate status is there- fore the best that Ukraine (as well as Georgia and Moldova, which also recently applied for membership) can hope for. It would be a welcome sign of in- tent. They would join Albania and North Macedonia in the EU's waiting room: both have been awarded candidate status but have yet to begin accession negotiations, currently blocked by a Bulgarian veto. Two other countries, Monte- negro and Serbia, have opened accession negotiations but re- main years away from complet- ing them. A merit-based process "The discussions today will enable us to finalise our assess- ment by the end of next week," added von der Leyen during her visit to Kyiv. "The path is known, it is a merit-based path forward. It is a path where, I must say, I really appreciate the enormous efforts and the determination of Ukraine." Yet while the Commission's recommendation that Ukraine be granted candidate status would be a welcome show of support, it guarantees nothing given that it is the European Council – made up of the lead- ers of all 27 members – that will make the final call. It must do so unanimously. The leaders of several coun- tries, said to include Denmark and the Netherlands, as well as France and Germany, are re- portedly yet to have been won round to the merits of offering Ukraine candidate status. Last month, French President Emanuel Macron angered Kyiv when he said that it would take "decades" for Ukraine to be- come an EU member, suggest- ing instead a "parallel Europe- an community" which, without offering too much detail, he added could "anchor countries which are geographically in Eu- rope and share our values". Unpalatable as his comments were for Ukraine, it is worth noting that Croatia was the last country to join the EU, in 2013, and although its econo- my, political system and judici- ary were far more aligned with Brussels when it began acces- sion negotiations, the process still took 10 years. The future of Europe Speaking alongside von der Leyen in Kyiv at the weekend, Zelensky said that the EU's de- cision on Ukraine would "de- termine" the future of Europe. "It is now being determined what the future of a united Eu- rope will be, and whether there will be a future at all. A positive response from the European Union to the Ukrainian appli- cation will signify a positive an- swer to the question of whether the European project has a fu- ture at all," he said. On a visit to Brussels last week, Ukraine's deputy prime minister, Olha Stefanishyna, sounded less than optimistic about the country's EU pros- pects. "None of the 27 would say right in the face of the presi- dent 'no', but what is happen- ing behind the scenes is a clear willingness to put obstacles in- to the process," she said. An outright 'no' from the Eu- ropean Council remains an un- likely prospect, however, with the most probably outcome thought by Brussels insiders to be candidate status with strict conditions, something that would be viewed in Kyiv as not good enough, not least as any kind of EU rebuff to Ukraine will be amplified by Russia's propaganda machine. This was something that Lat- vian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkēvičs – a staunch support- er of Ukraine's EU membership aspirations – warned of in an interview with the Washington Post last week. "This is a country at war, and they need a morale boost," he said. "I can imagine what the Russian propaganda is going to do with it." But given that the granting of applicant status usually takes a minimum of 18 months from the moment that an application is filed, even 'candidate status with conditions' – as long as it offers Ukraine a clear timeline and framework – should prob- ably be viewed as a victory, no matter how small: Ukraine for- mally applied only in March. Moldova yes, Georgia no Of the other new applicants, Moldova has the best chance of being granted candidate status, with Georgia likely to be told it needs to do more, according to the Brussels think tank the Centre for European Studies, which last week published a re- port on the pair's applications. It said that Moldova was "next at risk" from Russian aggres- sion, and recommended that the EU should extend it candi- date status. On Georgia, the report said the formal accession process would be premature. Its economic reforms had sur- passed both Ukraine and Mol- dova and other EU candidate states, it said, but on democra- cy, the Tbilisi government had contradicted "the EU's funda- mental values". These articles are part of a content series called Ewropej. This is a multi-newsroom initiative part-funded by the European Parliament to bring the work of the EP closer to the citizens of Malta and keep them informed about matters that affect their daily lives. These articles reflect only the authors' view. The European Parliament is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.