MaltaToday previous editions

MALTATODAY 20 August 2023

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1506016

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 38 of 39

maltatoday | SUNDAY • 20 AUGUST 2023 11 LAW CLASSIFIEDS IF there is a change in circum- stances which allow the reduc- tion of a garnishee order, the Court may reduce or remove that garnishee order. This was held in Karl Magri and Jackie Magri vs Jurgen Vassallo de- cided on 14 August 2023 by the Magistrates Court. The Court was presided by Magistrate Victor Axiak. Jurgen Vassallo filed an appli- cation stating that a garnish- ee order issued by the Magris was issue with bad intentions and that it was frivolous and vexatious. Vassallo asked the Court to issue a penalty against the Magris in terms of Article 836(8) of the Code of Organi- sation and Civil Procedure and also to award him damages in terms of Article 836(9). Vas- sallo asked the Court to revoke the garnishee order. Karl and Jackie Magri replied to this application by rubbish- ing the claim and asked the court to turn down the request to revoke the garnishee order. The Court criticized both parties for presenting volumi- nous documentation, since the Court at this stage will decide the application on a prima fa- cie level. It will not go in depth on the case, since this will be done in the court case, which followed the garnishee order. The garnishee order was filed by the Magris for the sum of €14,867 for the non-comple- tion of works that were taking place in a property in Malta. Vassallo is now attacking the garnishee order in terms of Article 836(1)(d) and (f) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (COCP) which al- lows a counter-warrant if the amount is not justified or else the circumstances under which the garnishee order was issued were not reasonable. Vassallo is claiming that there is no written agreement between the parties on when the works should be conclud- ed. The delay was the Magris' doing and not his and further- more he had to wait for other workmen to conclude their works before he could contin- ue. It was the Magris' architect who oversaw the works and in addition the sum claimed is ex- aggerated. When analysing Article 836(1) (d) of the COCP the Court quoted from Stewart Desmond Stanley vs Therese Mangion Galea, decided by the First Hall of the Civil Courts on 29 July 2005. In this case, the Court held that the Court should first see whether there is a right to be protected and secondly that the sum corresponds with the liquidated claim. The Court held that it went through the documents pre- sented by Vassallo, but did not find anything determining to the effect that the sum men- tioned in the garnishee order was too excessive and merited a reduction or removal. As to the other ground for the removal of the garnishee or- der under Article 836(1)(f) of the COCP, the Court held that caselaw showed that the re- moval of the garnishee order is allowed only if it is shown that the circumstances changed af- ter the garnishee order was is- sued. The Court quoted from Fran- cis Spiteri et vs Charles Dar- manin et decided on 25 August 2010 and Roberto Carlos Calle- ja vs Gerard Dominic Borg Mizzi, decided on 12 February 2020 by the First Hall of the Civil Court. In this case, Vas- sallo failed to show the Court that there were any changes to the circumstances that justified the revocation of the garnishee order. As to Vassallo's request to issue penalties against the Magris the Court quoted Arti- cle 836(8) of the COCP, which allows the Court to issue a penalty between €1,164.69 to €6,988.12, if a court case is not filed on time or else if the ap- plicant did not call upon the debtor to pay at least 15 days prior to filing of the warrant or else when there is no doubt on the debtor's liquidity. The Court quoted from another decree Carmel Farrugia et vs Charmaine Farrugia pro et noe decided by the First Hall of the Civil Courts on 2 August 2012 wherein the Court decided that the awarding of penalties is at the discretion of the court and therefore, the Court must be convinced that one of the cir- cumstances mentioned in the Article 836(8) of the COCP existed. The Court was not convinced that penalties were necessary in this case. The Court then moved to dis- miss Vassallo's requests. A garnishee order may be reduced if the circumstances have changed LAW REPORT MALCOLM MIFSUD Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates HOLIDAY ACCOMMODATION MARSALFORN, Gozo - holiday apart- ments for short or long lets with mag- nificent sea-views. Call 21556021, 27556021, 79426883 PROPERTY TO LET SHOP TO LEASE - Class 4 B 60 sqm corner shop to lease in San Gwann. Key money €49,888 and €40 a day rental. Call on 79703404. XLENDI - catering premises in prime site to let. Can be used for other com- mercial purposes. Phone 79493021, 79426883, 77481592 or 77484029 SERVICES COLLECTIBLE items such panini albums and loose stickers, old postcards and posted envelopes, medals, militar- ia, coins and paper money, books, toys, stamps, badges, paintings, gold & silver items etc. Call on 21310238, 99246632. SITUATIONS VACANT BUS DRIVERS - Oasis Operations Ltd are seeking for bus drivers. Kindly send your CV on philip@oasistoursmalta. com CLEANER - Gordon's Moto Centre are looking for a full time cleaner. Interested applicants are requested to send their CV's to customercare@gor- donsmoto.com SNF OPERATORS- we are seeking to recruit staff for the position of Water sports Jetty helper. Please send an email on info@sunfunmalta.com WAITER/WAITRESS - required for busy hotel restaurant in Naxxar. Must be fluent in English, be able to work flexible hours including weekends and public holidays. Min 3 years' experience in similar position. Call +365 2798 8357 for more info - The Village Hotel LTD. CLASSIFIEDS INFO @MEDIATODAY.COM.MT

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MALTATODAY 20 August 2023