Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1533641
11 EDITORIAL maltatoday | WEDNESDAY • 26 MARCH 2025 PEOPLE within the Labour Party, who still have a socialist conscience, should voice their concern at Robert Abela's shocking statements about human rights in parliament on Monday. The Prime Minister lifted his mask to reveal his true self – a person who believes human rights can be applied selectively. "Malta will continue to fight for the strengthening of human rights but only where it is merited," the Prime Minister told parliament so brazenly as he doubled-down on his commitment to push for reform of the Euro- pean Convention of Human Rights when Malta takes over the Council of Europe presidency in May. This statement is worrying because it implies, within the context of the migration argument he was making, that failed asylum seekers do not have human rights. Indeed, this is such a dangerous argument that it could be easily stretched to all migrants, pris- oners and whichever category seems undeserving of human rights in Abela's eyes. It is no wonder that a very pointed Ombudsman report on the atrocities perpetrated inside the Corradino Correctional Facility when it was run by retired army officer Alex Dalli was brushed aside so easily by the Prime Minister. He simply gives a damn about the human rights of certain people. Indeed, he only seems concerned about the human rights of those who could potentially be investigated for corruption and uses this as his justification to stifle the citizens' right to request a magisterial inquiry. Abela should have been bolder on Monday and clearly told us which people do not merit hav- ing their human rights protected. He would have spared us the agony of being accused for the umpteenth time of misinterpreting him. He should have explained why such a reform was not listed when Ian Borg outlined Malta's priorities for its presidency of the Council of Eu- rope last month. But it is concerning that Abela should conflate talk of reforming the human rights convention with the need to find workable solutions to tackle irregular migration. The lack of effective return of migrants who do not qualify for any protection has nothing to do with the human rights convention. It all boils down to a lack of coordination and dialogue with recipient countries that are required to take back their citizens. The EU as a bloc needs to do much more on this front. Even organisations like UNHCR understand that failed asylum seekers – those who do not qualify for refugee or protection status – have to be sent back to their countries of origin and no human rights court has ever blocked such returns unless it is proven that the people concerned were denied the opportunity to be heard if they requested protection. The problem with Italy's arrangement with Al- bania is that the two detention centres built there were going to house migrants who had not yet been processed; who would not have had the op- portunity of being heard and interviewed. What the European Commission is proposing when al- lowing countries to seek 'innovative solutions' is that rejected asylum seekers could be transferred to third countries under bilateral arrangements until they are repatriated. This strategy has its risks but is quite different from one where peo- ple are outright denied the opportunity to ask for asylum. On the issue of what constitutes a safe country is a matter to be tackled at UN level. This lead- er agrees that there may be circumstances where it is possible to return migrants to safe regions within countries where there is conflict or tur- moil but reforming the human rights convention to settle this issue is like opening a window to let in a breeze only to be swept away by a gust. Touching the human rights convention is dan- gerous. It can lead to very ugly consequences, which is why we remain shocked as to how no- body in the Labour Party has the temerity to even question the Prime Minister's statements. It is a shame that Labour backbenchers, minis- ters and party functionaries are sheepishly sub- mitting to a Prime Minister who is more com- fortable embracing Europe's far-right leaders and eulogising the Trump doctrine. They really shouldn't be bothered when attributed the fascist label. Where have the socialists gone? maltatoday MaltaToday, MediaToday Co. Ltd, Vjal ir-Rihan, San Gwann SGN 9016 MANAGING EDITOR: SAVIOUR BALZAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR: KURT SANSONE EDITOR: PAUL COCKS Tel: (356) 21 382741-3, 21 382745-6 Website: www.maltatoday.com.mt E-mail: dailynews@mediatoday.com.mt and variable factors. In relation to the constant factors, discre- tion can be exercised with lic- it and illicit cores, managerial absence of visibility, secrecy of managers preserving police cul- ture even if corruption-prone, low salary and status issues, and affiliation with criminals that hinder the performance of police duties. These factors clearly emerge from statistics and information regarding the 23 police officers found guilty of criminal offences since 2017. How then does our 'clean' re- cruit react when he encounters such malpractices? Newcomers soon become aware of the clean and dirty zones and eventual- ly succumb to the irresistible temptation of subscribing to such zones. Criminality being their sworn enemy, our police, the majority of whom are honest, disciplined and well-meaning officers ready to sacrifice their lives in uphold- ing the law and maintaining public order, will continue with their daily daunting task of fight- ing it with all possible legitimate means. At the same time, however, they also have to deal with an- other, perhaps even more dan- gerous and unlikely enemy from within all of their ranks. Police corruption can arise from abuse of public power for private gain and can also have damaging effects on individual lives