MaltaToday previous editions

MALTATODAY 24 March 2022

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1462499

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 15

15 maltatoday | THURSDAY • 24 MARCH 2022 Saviour Balzan Saviour Balzan is Managing Editor of MediaToday IT has been the most boring four weeks of election cam- paigns I have ever experienced in my life. It has also been the most serene and calm of all campaigns, where provocation and confrontation were on no- body's agenda. Unknown to anyone, both parties even agreed not to doorstep their leaders at party rallies and press conferences. Were it not for the independ- ent media, the unorthodox and unexpected questions would never have been fielded. The parties went into over- drive proposing an electoral programme deprived of any economic sense but simply geared to impress the elector- ate with one cardinal message. If you vote for our party you will be better off with a hand- some sum of cash. It might not work for those who have some grey matter but if you are a pensioner and not exactly swimming in mon- ey, a cheque of 200 euros is a notable contribution. And if you are family of three and just 30, two 100 euro cheques is good news. People are simply interested in one simple thing: as long as I have money or as long as I am better off, I could not care less. The simple answer to that is that most people are bet- ter off than they were in 2012 and most of them could not give a flying hoot if Sannat gets ruined, if the Turtle dove can be shot out of the skies in Spring, if more roads are being planned, if land recla- mation does take place, if the same old faces are elected or if more money is wasted to turn our urban centres into float- ing plastic gardens while the rest of the countryside is being treated to an extermination programme by the greedy con- struction lobby. The alternative to all this is of course possible if the oppo- sition and other parties muster an alternative that offers a a better future. Okay, let start by looking at the small parties. ABBA and Partit Popolari are out of the question. They are not only a motley of mis- fits unable to clearly state what they stand for, but more akin to a loony party grounded in some time-warp. Next comes Arnold Cassola, the ex-Alternattiva boss, who single-handedly organised an impressive campaign. Very presentable, but what I cannot understand is why he did not try to get others to run on his list. Remarkable for being so de- pressing and unimpressive, was ADPD. Surely, this could be their last show. Since their inception in 1989, they have slowly but steadily committed mistake after mistake in their presentation and message. They insist of standing for election, but when they stand together they look like the cast of a British TV comedy. And if that was not enough, they chose as their slogan a broom. Yes a broom! And Carmel Ca- copardo, their leader, thought it was one of the brightest and most riveting slogans the Mal- tese public could be presented with! Apart from the fact that Cacopardo has a very serious problem with charisma, dress sense and communication. The next candidate is Ber- nard Grech, the courageous leader of the Nationalist par- ty. He has come a long way. Taking over a party a year and some months ago and facing an election soon after, Grech managed to steer clear of the 'corruption' battle-cry and with that he managed to side- line the 'Daphne crowd' who have been instrumental in winning Labour their two last elections. He also managed to improve the social media campaign- ing, thanks to Lovin Malta shareholder cum adviser Chris Peregin, who masters this communication tool. But when it came to content, the PN were nowhere near to what the PL had to propose. Their numerous mistakes or inability to understand their own proposals left them far too often wasting precious time explaining what their proposals really meant. And they started on the wrong foot when four of their veteran MPs, Mario Galea, Claudio Grech, Kirsty Debono and Clyde Puli, threw in their towel in the first two days of the campaign. Neither did it help that heavyweights Beppe Fenech Adami and Mario De Marco were excluded from the media. In the very end, the best cam- paign the PN had was the feel- ing of revulsion in the middle ground for the Labour Party for sins past and present. But there were no impres- sive names on the PN list. The only rising stars appeared to be Mark Anthony Sammut, Alex Borg from Gozo, and Joe Giglio. Giglio rocked the 9th and 10th district, but when it came to debating or articu- lating economic arguments, Giglio failed to impress. On the Labour side, it was clear that Robert Abela would only be campaigning when and where it mattered. Avoid- ing the independent media or a debate with Bernard Grech, bolstered by the campaign methods he used in the lead- ership battle two years before, this time round he was not only addressing solely the La- bour delegates but general election voters, young, old, blue, red, floaters and cynics. Abela's war chest gave La- bour the chance to flood social media with their campaign. And Abela, though less poetic (when compared to Muscat), has managed to show that he has a clear understanding of his proposals and economic vision. When faced with an on- slaught on his time at the Plan- ning Authority and the remu- neration he received, Abela's reply was scripted and he nev- er steered away from the same retort. He was also comforted by the fact that this direct order finds its roots in 2001 when the Na- tionalist party awarded Robert Abela's father George Abela, then a Labour rebel, with the legal advisory office at the Planning Authority. Abela's rallying cry was also consistent: it reminded peo- ple of their quality of life, their income, the stability in pric- es, the way COVID had been tackled, and that he had shoul- dered the sins of the past and responded. He reached out to every lobby with a gift, the car enthusiasts with a track, the Marsaskala residents with no marina, the hunters with more shooting and employees with more tax benefits. It was as if Santa had come to town. But there were also some radical signals tucked in the manifest or debates. Referenc- es to euthanasia, IVF, abortion and no homework at school, all contributed to keeping the radicalism that was unleashed in 2013 somehow alive. And wonder of wonders, the elephant in the room, Joseph Muscat, was never mentioned by Robert Abela. As if he did not exist. That was not a trivial thing to do. What happens next Saturday could very well be reflected in the surveys that have been published in the MaltaToday daily survey over the last three weeks. It may not be the case if somehow the survey has missed something in the 'don't know voters' or the 'do not want to vote.' If Abela wins with a substan- tial majority he should really be humbled. And he should consider facing the real chal- lenges of this country, not the proposals that were construed to win him a massive majority. But if he is bruised he should wake up to the fact that the country has rediscovered cali- bration and the cycle of demo- cratic majorities. Then he should return to the roots of a true social demo- cratic party and build for the future of Malta and his politi- cal legacy. The campaigns, the parties and the choices Most people are better off than they were in 2012 and most of them could not give a flying hoot if Sannat gets ruined, if the Turtle dove can be shot out of the skies in Spring, if more roads are being planned, if land reclamation does take place, if the same old faces are elected or if more money is wasted to turn our urban centres into floating plastic gardens

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MALTATODAY 24 March 2022