MaltaToday previous editions

MaltaToday 30 October 2022

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 29 of 67

maltatoday | SUNDAY • 30 OCTOBER 2022 OPINION 10 Raphael Vassallo OPINION What happened to that Public Domain Act, by the way? WHAT 'Public Domain Act', I hear you ask? Well… I can't re- ally blame you if you've forgot- ten all about it, by now. After all, it was way back in 2015 that Jason Azzopardi first tabled the motion, as a private member's bill; and it was the following year – 2016 - that the legisla- tion itself was unanimously ap- proved by Parliament. That's six whole years ago, folks: time enough, I should think, for a law that was sup- posed to "safeguard environ- mentally or culturally signifi- cant sites against unsustainable development, excessive com- mercialisation and environ- mental destruction", to be comfortably – and convenient- ly – 'forgotten'. Not just by the general public, mind you: but also, by the same government MPs who had unanimously enacted this law, in 2016; and some of whom also trumpeted the event as a "revolutionary bill", and "a seminal piece of legislation guaranteeing the guardianship of the national assets for future generations." But to give its full due (what- ever that's actually worth, giv- en that it was never actually implemented), this bill was supposed to: > "allow for sites to be nomi- nated for public domain status, imposing a positive obligation on the government to preserve them for future generations.' > "set a deadline of Septem- ber 15 every year for the Lands Minister to present Parliament with a list of nominated sites, to be compiled by the Planning Authority after a public consul- tation process." > 'automatically categorise the foreshore as public domain, while sites such as valleys, squares, woods, forts, nature reserves and cultural artefacts, can be proposed for listing'; and lastly, > 'nominate 24 sites [of par- ticular 'historical, cultural and environmental significance'] to be granted Public Domain sta- tus, with immediate effect.' Small wonder, I suppose, that a government which was so very quick to approve this law, six years ago – and to boast about it, too! - is now so keen for us all to simply 'forget' that they ever did any such thing. For when you fast-forward back to the present… it's as though this 'seminal', 'revolu- tionary', 'ground-breaking' and 'pioneering' Act of Parliament, never even happened at all. Let's start with the '24 sites that were supposedly ear- marked for Public Domain Sta- tus' in 2016. Not only has no such protection been granted to even a single one of them, in the meantime… but to cap it all, almost every single one has been further developed, and further exposed to commercial exploitation, ever since. In fact, you could almost liter- ally take them on a case-by-case basis. In 2017, we were told that "sites nominated for public do- main status included Comino, the Valletta coastline, Ħondoq ir-Rummien, parts of Ta' Ċenċ, the coast between Ġnejna and Mtaħleb, the Floriana pinetum, Manoel Island, Wied Garnaw, the Wied iż-Żurrieq to Għar Lapsi shore, and others." By my count, only two of those areas seem to have re- mained relatively unscathed, in the past six years: the Floriana Pinetum (though who knows? By the time I finish this article, there'll probably be a develop- ment application for that site, too); and Wied Garnaw (which marks a rare case where public opposition actually succeeded in blocking a PA planning per- mit). As for the rest, however… let's take them one by one. The Valletta coastline may not have been directly disfigured, by any new development aris- ing from within its own con- fines – at least, not yet – but it has certainly been impacted by the mushrooming of so many (mostly high-rise) projects in the immediately vicinity. Besides: it remains threat- ened, to this day, by the soon- to-be-commenced Manoel Island project… which is also mentioned on that (forgotten) list of proposed 'public domain sites': despite the fact that it has since been green-lighted for the development of a 'tour- ism village' by the Planning Au- thority. And because both those are- as happen to also include 'the first 15 metres of the coast- line', among their topographi- cal characteristics… effectively, their designation as 'Public Do- main Status' would also have to – as per the wording of the legislation itself – preclude any form of development at all. It's right there, in black on white, in the 'revolutionary' Public Domain Act that was approved with such fanfare in 2016… only to never be spo- ken about again. "The first 15 metres of the coastline, the country's seabed and govern- ment-owned sites of histori- cal and ecological importance CANNOT BE COMMERCIAL- ISED…" (my emphasis). Funny, isn't it, how the same site can be legally designated as 'part of the national cul- tural heritage', and 'not to be commercially exploited, in any way'… and yet, simultaneously, also 'gifted to a handful of lo- cal entrepreneurs, to be turned into a private business venture, for their own exclusive profit'? I need hardly add, of course, that the same consideration applies just as much to the most blatantly exploited of the above-mentioned 'sites of his- torical and ecological impor- tance': Comino. Here, the present government has not only failed to designate the island as 'public domain', as promised; but it likewise disre- garded the recommendations of its own 'Comino Manage- ment Plan' of 2016; it allowed construction works to take place illegally in a Natura 2000 site; and all the while, it con- sistently turned a blind eye to the ongoing commercialisation of even its most sensitive coast- al areas… … to the extent that Movi- ment Graffiti had to step in (twice, this summer) to actual- ly enforce all the laws, that our government seems so hell-bent on ignoring. And if that wasn't bad enough: the PA has only just approved an extension of the Comino Hotel… which will not merely expand the footprint of the existing (tourism/cater- ing) establishment; but also 'extend' the ownership of its newly-built bungalows, even to residential (i.e., non-tourist) buyers…. thus firing the starter pistol, for an umpteenth 'mad development scramble' on that island, too. In other words, the PA has just approved the first few blocks of what will no doubt evolve into a whole new village on Comino… and not just a 'tourism village', this time; but a permanent town, that will attract permanent residents of its own; and with them, more traffic; more amenities; more pollution; more… … well, you can work out the rest for yourselves. The once pristine, utterly unspoilt nature reserve that Comino used to be, will be replaced by precise- ly the same urban sprawl that has already disfigured so much of Malta; and is now starting to eat its way into Gozo, too. And this, despite a 2016 law that was supposed to 'protect Comi- no from commercialisation'… The same, of course, applies to most of those other sites too: Ta' Cenc is now neighbour to the veritable eyesore that Jo- seph Portelli has turned nearby Sannat into; parts of the Ghar Lapsi coastline have literally COLLAPSED, due to construc- tion works on the umpteenth 'private business venture' in the area; and as for Hondoq ir-Rummien… … well, that brings me right back to the question I asked in the headline. Next Thursday, the Planning Authority board will convene

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MaltaToday 30 October 2022