Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1489031
maltatoday | SUNDAY • 25 DECEMBER 2022 11 LAW CLASSIFIEDS IN a judgement in the names of Al-Masri Agostina Vs Valenzia Dr Benjamin Et Noe handed down by the Civil Court (Fam- ily section) the Court upheld the argument that a retrial can only be granted in exceptional circumstances and this mecha- nism in the law cannot be used as a means of obtaining a fur- ther stage of appeal. The plaintiff had initiated sep- aration proceedings against her husband on the grounds that her husband had abandoned her and her son and had even absconded from the island and that she had lost contact with her husband for a number of years prior. Since the plaintiff's husband was absent from Malta and the plaintiff could not establish any form of contact with him, the defendant was represented by deputy curators appoint- ed by the Court. The plaintiff successfully obtained personal separation from the defendant, wherein the defendant was also ordered to pay maintenance to the plaintiff. Following the judgement, no appeal was filed by either par- ty within the term allowable by law. However, after the lapse of such time, the husband sud- denly filed a request in front of the Family section of the Civil Court to request a retrial of the separation proceedings. In his application for retrial, the husband had claimed that he had returned to Malta after spending some time in Syria and Libya during the civil wars in those countries. He claimed that during his time abroad he had kept contact with his wife and that it was his wife herself had warned him not to make contact with her and not to come to Malta. He claimed that she always had a mobile num- ber with which she could com- municate with him or indicate this number to the appointed curators. He also claimed that he kept regular contact with his wife and also passed on several pay- ments through third parties to her whilst he was abroad and that she had also requested him to make an official letter con- cerning his absence so that she may collect financial support from the Government. The husband further claimed that his wife had a relation- ship with a third party and that therefore she had no right to de- mand payment of maintenance. The husband went on to claim that he became aware of the judgement concerning his and his wife's separation only after checking at the Court registry through the assistance of his friend. Therefore, the husband argued that his wife had obtained the judgement by deception since she failed to give him adequate notice of the proceedings or to give his phone number to the curator. In light of all of these claims, the husband requested that the separation proceedings be annulled and that these be re-heard afresh. The wife responded by deny- ing all the claims made by her husband and stuck to the facts that she had claimed when she initiated separation proceed- ings. Moreover, the wife re- sponded that although she had lost contact with her husband prior to initiating separation proceedings, the husband had knowledge of the separation proceedings before the judg- ment was handed down and he knew about the facts and the effects of the judgment before the term for appeal term had expired. Therefore, the on the basis of these facts the wife argued that the husband's remedies were for her husband to either dispute the case whilst it was ongoing, or alternatively to file an appeal on time. She further held that in default of her husband utilizing these options, her husband was now trying to appeal the judg- ment under the disguise of a retrial. The wife further responded by stating that the requisites for a retrial did not result in this case, especially on the basis alleged by the husband which were that the judgement was obtained by deceit and that he was not noti- fied according to law. With reference to these grounds for retrial, the Code of Organization and Civil Proce- dure states the following:- A new trial of a cause decided by a judgment given in second instance or by the Civil Court, First Hall, in its Constitutional Jurisdiction, may be demanded by any of the parties concerned, such judgment being first set aside, in any of the following cases: (a) where the judgment was obtained by fraud on the part of any of the parties to the preju- dice of the other party; (b) where the sworn applica- tion was not served on the par- ty cast, provided that, notwith- standing such omission, such party shall not have entered an appearance at the trial; Having heard several witness- es and considered all evidence that was produced over a span of four years, the Court con- cluded that the husband did not submit evidence showing that his wife had obtained the judg- ment against him by deception, or that he had not been notified in accordance with the law. Nor was there any proof that the wife had not passed the correct information to the deputy cu- rators to make contact with the husband. The Court further declared that considering the evidence submitted by the husband him- self, it appears that he knew about the separation proceed- ings for sure before the term of the appeal passed. The Court further agreed with the wife in saying that the hus- band was seemingly trying to appeal the judgement by invok- ing the retrial mechanism. The request for a retrial was ulti- mately rejected by the Court. Interestingly, in its conclu- sions, the Court declared that an application for retrial should not last four years to be deter- mined. Either there is a reason for the request, or there is not. It is simply a matter of fact that can easily be proven. In this case it was evident that there was no basis for the retrial request. The plaintiff was assisted by Dr Gianluca Cappitta. Retrial proceedings should not serve as a means of a further appeal LAW REPORT MALCOLM MIFSUD Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates CLASSIFIEDS INFO @MEDIATODAY.COM.MT HOLIDAY ACCOMMODATION MARSALFORN, Gozo - holiday apartments for short or long lets with magnificent sea-views. Call 21556021, 27556021, 79426883 PROPERTY TO LET XLENDI - catering premises in prime site to let. Can be used for other com- mercial purposes. Phone 79493021, 79426883, 77481592 or 77484029 PROPERTY FOR SALE SAN GWANN- Open plan 190sqm, ready to move into designer finished second floor apartment in a central quiet street forming part of a block of 5 apartments. Two double A/C bed- rooms and 1 single A/C bedroom, two bathrooms, lift, double glazing doors and windows. Direct from own- er €350k inquire on 79402244. TARXIEN - Larger than usual first floor duplex maisonette. Three bed- rooms; double glazed windows; inverter air conditioners including solar water heater. Being sold fur- nished. Own airspace with possibility of further development. Contact own- er on 99912005/99450639. VACANCIES BLOKRETE Ltd, Lija requires a clean- er/helper on a full-time basis. The ideal candidate must have previous experience and be ready to work flex- ible hours. Apply info@blokrete.com. mt. SERVICES COLLECTIBLE items such panini albums and loose stickers, old post- cards and posted envelopes, medals, militaria, coins and paper money, books, toys, stamps, badges, paint- ings, gold & silver items etc. Call on 21310238, 99246632.