Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1496177
maltatoday | SUNDAY • 2 ARPIL 2023 11 LAW CLASSIFIEDS THE court must interpret the law on the recusal of a judge strictly. This was held in a judgement in Mary Grace D'Amato -v- Luqa D' Amato et, delivered on 23 March 2023 by the First Hall of the Civil Courts presided by Mr Justice Robert Mangion. The case concerned a claim filed by the Plaintiff wherein she is asking the court to re- scind a contract of sale of a ga- rage which included in a separa- tion judgement. The Defendant Luqa D' Amato asked that Mr Justice Mangion recuse himself because he was the judge that delivered the separation con- tract. This was based on Article 734(1)(d) of the Code of Or- ganization and Civil Procedure. This read: "(1) A judge may be challenged or abstain from sitting in a cause (d)(i) if he had given ad- vice, pleaded or written on the cause or on any other matter connected therewith or depend- ant thereon; (2) A judge may be chal- lenged or abstain from sitting in a cause when he has previ- ously taken cognizance of and expressed himself on the same merits of that cause when sitting as a judge in the Court of volun- tary jurisdiction." A judge may be challenged on- ly on the ground listed in Article 734 and these are in exceptional circumstances. In this case the separation was decided by the presiding judge in this case. The Defendant ar- gued that justice could not be meted out, once the presiding judge is aware of the serious ac- cusation the parties hurdled at each other during the separa- tion case. The Court pointed out that the subject matter of this case, is with regard to a contract that had taken place after the sepa- ration and therefore, has noth- ing to do with the separation of the parties. Therefore, none of the circumstances mentioned in Article 734. The Court quoted a constitutional judgement San- dro Chetcuti -v- Avukat Gen- erali decided on 12 July 2005, where there are instances where the protection of an individual's fundamental human rights may prevail over general procedural law. Therefore, there may be in- stances not covered by Article 734 of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (COCP), but Article 39 of the Constitu- tion and Article 6 of the Euro- pean Convention may allow a remedy is the impartiality of a judge may have to be protected. Mr Justice Mangion agreed that there may be exception- al reasons that a judge may be challenged for reasons not listed in Article 734. The chal- lenging of a judge is intended to protect the integrity of the ad- ministration of justice. In fact a judge is challenged when there is doubt that he or she will be impartial to the case they have in front of him/her. A judge would have taken an oath to be impartial and guarantee his or her independence. In this case the Defendant declared that he has not doube of the impartial- ity and professionalism and in- tegrity of the Court. The issue that the Defendant had was on the fact that in the separation case the Parties had made seri- ous accusations to each other. Therefore, he is afraid that the Court may be bias of what was said in the separation case. The Court quoted from a European Court of Huma Rights judge- ment, Lindon Otchakovskylau- rens and July -v- France decided on 22 October 2007: "There are two tests for assess- ing whether a tribunal is impar- tial: the first consists in seek- ing to determine a particular judge's personal conviction or interest in a given case and the second is ascertaining wheth- er the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legiti- mate doubt in this respect...... As to the second test, when applied to a body sitting as a bench, it means determining whether, quite apart from the personal conduct of any of the members of that body, there are ascertaina- ble facts which may raise doubts as to its impartiality. In this re- spect even 9 appearances may be of some importance. It follows that when it is being decided whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular body lacks impar- tiality, the standpoint of those claiming that it is not impartial is important but not decisive. What is decisive is whether the fear can be held to be objectively justified." In another judgement by the UK Court of Appeal Locabail (UK) Ltd -v- Bayfied, the Court said: "The mere fact that a judge, earlier in the same case or in a previous case, had commented adversely on a party or witness, or found the evidence of a par- ty or witness to be unreliable, would not without more found a sustainable objection. In most cases, we think, the answer, one way or the other, will be obvious. But if in any case there is real ground for doubt, that doubt should be resolved in favour of recusal. We repeat: every ap- plication must be decided on the facts and circumstances of the individual case. The great- er the passage of time between the event relied on as showing a danger of bias and the case in which the objection is raised, the weaker (other things being equal) the objection will be." The case in hand concerns a garage which was assigned to the Defendant in the separation, as long as he pays the Plaintiff €594.15 and continues to pay the bank. In 2021 the Defendant sold the garage. The Court held that it could not understand how it could be bias on this point of law and how he can be unduly influenced knowing who was responsible for the break- down of the marriage, The Court then moved to turn down the challenged and or- dered that the case continue. Strict interpretation of the law when challenging a judge LAW REPORT MALCOLM MIFSUD Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates CLASSIFIEDS INFO @MEDIATODAY.COM.MT HOLIDAY ACCOMMODATION MARSALFORN, Gozo - holiday apart- ments for short or long lets with mag- nificent sea-views. Call 21556021, 27556021, 79426883 PROPERTY TO LET SHOP TO LEASE - Class 4 B 60 sqm corner shop to lease in San Gwann. Key money €49,888 and €40 a day rental. Call on 79703404. XLENDI - catering premises in prime site to let. Can be used for other com- mercial purposes. Phone 79493021, 79426883, 77481592 or 77484029 PROPERTY FOR SALE HAL-SAFI - Fully furnished 3-bedroom apartment 1 with ensuite, main bath- room, open plan living area and kitch- en, 2 front balconies, 1 back balcony with countryside views. DIRECT FROM OWNER. Call on 99775854 for further information or viewing. SAN GWANN- Open plan 190sqm, ready to move into designer finished second floor apartment in a central quiet street forming part of a block of 5 apartments. Two double A/C bed- rooms and 1 single A/C bedroom, two bathrooms, lift, double glazing doors and windows. Direct from owner €350k inquire on 79402244. SERVICES COLLECTIBLE items such panini albums and loose stickers, old postcards and posted envelopes, medals, militar- ia, coins and paper money, books, toys, stamps, badges, paintings, gold & silver items etc. Call on 21310238, 99246632. SITUATIONS VACANT ADMINISTRATION EXECUTIVE - Oasis Operations Ltd are seeking for bus drivers. Kindly send your CV on philip@oasistoursmalta.com OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR - A++ Consultancy Ltd a vacancy has arisen for an office administrator. Applicants must have a minimum of five years' working experience. Fluently speaking English, French, Italian and Arabic. The post requires travelling on behalf of the company. Monthly rate from Eur900.00. Interested applicants may send email to secretary@a-plusplus.eu SNF OPERATORS- we are seeking to recruit staff for the position of Water sports Jetty helper. Please send an email on info@sunfunmalta.com THAI TRADITIONAL THERAPIST – Minimum of 10 years' experience required. Salary is negotiable based on skills and experience. Location is San Gwann. Kindly contact Maria at the Wellness Centre on 99596395