MaltaToday previous editions

MT 7 September 2016

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/723651

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 8 of 23

9 maltatoday, WEDNESDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 2016 Editorial To be ineffective, or not to be effective MaltaToday, MediaToday Co. Ltd, Vjal ir-Rihan, San Gwann SGN 9016 MANAGING EDITOR: SAVIOUR BALZAN ACTING EDITOR: JURGEN BALZAN Tel: (356) 21 382741-3, 21 382745-6 • Fax: (356) 21 385075 Website: www.maltatoday.com.mt E-mail: newsroom@mediatoday.com.mt Often it appears as though Mal- tese politicians – and politics in general – lead a double life. There are certain 'rules' and 'expectations' to conform to while addressing a local audi- ence… yet when speaking in an international context, those rules and expectations often seem to change. Former environment minister Leo Brincat's grilling before the European parliament this week was a classic case in point. As expected, a number of ques- tions focused on the Panama Papers, and his own vote against a motion of no confi- dence in disgraced minister Kondrad Mizzi. Brincat told his interlocutors that he had considered resign- ing when faced with the motion of no confidence… but added that he decided against it. "If one resigns in Malta, they would be a hero for a day, how- ever ultimately one would end up in the wilderness. I feel that by continuing to work within the structures, limited as your contribution may be, you will still be able to exert pressure from within." That is already considerably more than he ever said in a lo- cal context. It seems as though politicians somehow become more frank and less bound by the shackles of local politics, when facing foreign press or institutions. Nor is Brincat the only example. Former Commis- sioners such as Tonio Borg and Joe Borg were both pressed on their views regarding female reproductive rights in their respective 'grillings' before the European Parliament. Both sang from a significantly differ- ent hymn book from the one we were used to hearing them sing in Malta. Brincat's frankness is however more revealing. There is reason to believe that his assertions were not just aimed at def lect- ing the issue: along with other ministers, he had at various points hinted at his discomfort with the Panama Papers issue. "This shows I had no choice," Brincat said. "… but I will clarif y one point: I made vari- ous categorical statements in the media and I publicly warned that, if these kind of mistakes take place, my government risked demolishing its success. I don't think you can be more categorical than that." One way to be 'more categori- cal than that' would be to stand by one's principles even at the cost of losing one's seat, or popularity within the party. But with very rare exceptions - Franco Debono being a recent case in point – members of parliament are not generally ready to make any form of stand in the name of a higher prin- ciple: be it, transparency, the environment, the fight against corruption, etc. But this only reinforces the deeper significance of Brincat's admissions in Brussels. Leaving aside questions of his own com- petence for the post of Euro- pean Auditor – on which score he satisfied a majority of the EP members - Brincat has also con- firmed that Maltese democracy itself is in very bad shape. His defence of 'powerlessness' places its finger on the very crux of the matter. Repre- sentative democracy is failing in Malta, precisely because elected representatives feel they don't have any power unless they toe the party line. There is an irony in this, too. Brincat's earlier point about becoming a 'voice in the wilder- ness' is on one level perfectly true… but its truth also de- pends on each individual MPs' willingness to stand up and be counted. They, too, are part of the culture that teats internal dissent as a form of treachery. Effectively, however, it also implies that the leader of the party has absolute control over all his party's MPs, under the guise of 'party collegiality'. The fact that Brincat said he had no choice graphically confirms that loyalty to the party leader- ship comes before loyalty to the Constitution and the people. All along, of course, he did have a choice - as had other ministers who likewise thought Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schem- bri's positions were no longer tenable: Evarist Bartolo, Louis Grech, George Vella, etc. But they all decided to put party loyalty above their principles. This forces us to question Brincat's second argument: i.e., that "continuing to work within the structures" somehow ena- bles one "to exert pressure from within." One might reasonably ask how much 'pressure' Brincat and others think they 'exerted from within', considering that both Mizzi and Schembri are still in place to this day. Mizzi in par- ticular remains energy minister in all but in name, following a portfolio reassignment that didn't stop him from announc- ing every new development in the energy sector. So even if Brincat is correct to state that resigning would have been ineffective… how effective was his option to acquiesce? In this sense, it is arguably true that Leo Brincat – or any other minister or MP – 'had no choice'. By his own argu- ment, his only options were to resign and became an object of ridicule or contempt… without affecting the issue; or to remain party of the system, and still not have any effect. It is a clas- sic case of 'To be ineffective, or not to be effective'. Either way, the status quo prevails. All in all, this tells us a lot about the level of internal democracy within the parties themselves, and even more about the state of health of our parliamentary democracy as a whole.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MT 7 September 2016