MaltaToday previous editions

MT 19 April 2015

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/497863

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 24 of 55

25 The local council elections have resulted in an overwhelming victory for Joseph Muscat in Gozo and a comeback of sorts for Simon Busuttil in Malta. Overall the Labour part y won with a majorit y of 54%, down from 57%. The Nationalist part y improved its standing by significantly reducing the gap from 17 to 8.5 percentage points. Most of the areas which held local coun- cil elections are admittedly Labour strong- holds, so there was all along little realistic hope for the PN to overturn any individual council majorities. But voter turnout by district suggests at a glance that the Nationalist part y managed to make gains because more voters cast their ballot, having made a pesence in the polling booths because of the spring hunt- ing referendum; and the part y in govern- ment was on the other hand buoyed by a recent spate of largesse – such as reduced electricit y rates, increased children's allow- ances, etc. – all against the backdrop of an economy that is doing well. The PN managed to hang on to Nadur and Siggiewi, which must have been a relief... but the Labour part y won Munxar and Floriana. Which must have been disap- pointing for the Nationalist Part y. Either way, both Simon Busuttil and Joseph Muscat claimed victory. Tradition- ally, opposition parties have always fared better at council level; yet it was also not expected of the PN to gain a majorit y. On the other hand the PN fared miserably in Gozo. That was presumably because of the sympathy vote for spring hunting and the intensive campaigning by Muscat and his part y. That was apart from the scandal, which broke only recently, involving the hus- band of former Gozo minister Giovanna Debono. There is no doubt that Malta needs a strong opposition, not just for the benefit of the part y which occupies the position, but primarily for the benefit of democracy. But the results attained by the Nationalist part y cannot be solely attributed to Simon Busuttil. Indeed the leader of the opposi- tion did little in the way of campaigning. On the contrary he led a rather subdued if not stunted campaign. There is little doubt that the referendum itself served to galvanise voter turnout and in the process the PN voters rewarded their part y. Joseph Muscat cannot ignore this fact because in the advent of a national election, the exact situation would come into play. There is also a significant, albeit slight drop in Labour voter turnout which should serve to raise some concerns in the 'strat- egy group' of the governing Labour part y. Meanwhile Busuttil 's claims that his par- t y distinguishes itself from Labour by its 'honest y' does not sit comfortably with the recent history that saw the PN ousted from office, with a highly significant major- it y for its rivals, after years of unchecked corruption. It is simply not the reason why people have opted to vote for one part y and not another. It is very probable that Simon Busuttil has yet to realise that accusing the Labour part y of a lack of honest y, which may be very much the case, simply is not good enough to convince switchers. In the coming weeks it is expected that political parties will conduct their own post-mortems of the local election results. Needless to say, this task will be a critical one for the Nationalist and Labour parties. Already there is no doubt, with three years to go for the next election, that the contest will be between Simon Busuttil and Joseph Muscat. Busuttil has announced that Joseph Muscat is no longer invincible. He will have to prove this. Now more than ever, the PN must ask itself if it is able to bring back the switchers who deserted it in droves; whom it intends to represent; what its core positions are on various issues; and only then, how to con- tend with the massive campaign machinery of the Labour part y. Admittedly we seem to be living in less ideologically motivated times, and the stakes were arguably higher not so very long ago. But while the backdrop has changed, the game being played is still the same. It is a game in which one must adapt to the pre- vailing circumstances, or perish. Again, the spring hunting referendum illustrated this point. Though won by the Yes camp, almost half the country – 49% – voted against their part y leaders' intentions. This act of defiance was more conspicuous in traditional Nationalist strongholds than in Labour's. The PN therefore has to deal with a support-base that expects more than just meaningless soundbites and empt y rhetoric. It will not be content with a carbon copy of Labour, or predictable cave-ins to powerful lobbies. Nor will it necessarily be impressed with political confrontation just for the sake of confrontation. This is a voter segment that can think with a critical mind. The Nationalist Part y needs to give them, and the country, some- thing to think about. maltatoday, SUNDAY, 19 APRIL 2015 Editorial MaltaToday, MediaToday Co. Ltd, Vjal ir-Rihan, San Gwann SGN 9016 MANAGING DIRECTOR: ROGER DE GIORGIO MANAGING EDITOR: SAVIOUR BALZAN EXECUTIVE EDITOR: MATTHEW VELLA Tel: (356) 21 382741-3, 21 382745-6 • Fax: (356) 21 385075 Website: www.maltatoday.com.mt E-mail: newsroom@mediatoday.com.mt Quote of the week "The media now has its own stock-taking to do…" – Prime Minister Joseph Muscat comments on the media's role in supporting the 'no' vote in the referendum on the derogation from the EU ban on spring hunting Something to think about

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MT 19 April 2015