MaltaToday previous editions

MT 8 July 2018

Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/1002137

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 22 of 59

OPINION maltatoday | SUNDAY • 8 JULY 2018 23 I have an uncanny feeling that there is more to the 'lost and found' story of drugs stored in the Law Courts' strong room. Let's face it; things have been known to disappear from the Law Courts' strong room for some time. The famous machine-gun that was used in the murder of Raymond Caruana in 1986 also somehow disappeared from the strong room at the Law Courts. This was not a case of mislabelling. It was never found. We also had the story of a heavy gold chain said to belong to murder victim Mat- thew Zahra that disappeared from the quartermaster stores at the police headquarters. Ev- idence given in Court revealed that there are no security cameras in these stores. Recent media reports that an "unspecified" number of ec- stasy pills and three kilograms of cannabis resin disappeared from the Court's storeroom led to the Attorney General ordering an inquiry. In this case, nothing was said about security cameras in the Law Courts' strong room. They are not installed in there either, I hazard to guess. Both sets of 'lost' drugs were exhibits to be used in two separate pending criminal cases against two different accused. In the case of the cannabis resin, this could have been missing since 2004, when the cannabis was confiscated. Suddenly all was resolved. It was established that the drug had never left the strong room. It was wrongly labelled! A report in The Times last Wednesday claimed that incorrect details had been af- fixed on the cannabis package leading to it being reported as 'missing'. Readers were also comforted to learn that new procedures and added security features introduced in recent years made it difficult for anything to go missing. The cannabis blocks were exhib- ited as evidence way back in 2004 when these procedures had not been introduced. The logistical running of the Law Courts – as distinct from the workings of the Judiciary – has always been shaky, to say the least. Notifications by Court Marshalls – or rather their lack of – were always creating problems to the extent that the previous administration had to decrease drastically the number of notifications by Court Marshalls when many were subsituted by a system involving registered mail. Yet, lawyers still encounter problems when such notifica- tions are needed. I know too many stories to believe that all 'mistakes' and 'errors' occur- ring in the system are genuine. The recent story of an ac- cused man who was never found by Court Marshalls because he was serving a prison sentence shows that all is not well in the organisation of the system running the Law Courts. On Thursday, two Court Marshalls were accused of stealing the files from the acts of the case against a man accused of drug trafficking. One of them was also accused of stealing money deposited as evidence in another case. Nobody was surprised. The lack of serious manage- ment at the Law Courts is a reflection on the traditional lack of management skills in the civil service. Besides the Law Courts, the Lands Department and the Health sector seem to suffer from the same problem – although management at Mater Dei Hospital has recently made great strides forward. This is all due to the way our Civil Service has been stuck in an old model that was inher- ited from the colonial admin- stration when Malta became independent. Partly to solve this problem, different administrations have resorted to creating statutory authorities that are once re- moved from the general Civil Service. But surely, we cannot replace every government department by an authority! The story of the 'missing' cannabis resin that was lost and found could be genuine – but it still calls for a serious reform of the system. And, by the way, where have the ecstasy pills gone? Metsola and Orban My reference to Roberta Metsola in this column two weeks ago provoked the lady to contact me to tell me that I was wrong. Indeed, I was off the mark when I wondered what she had to say about the 'rule of law' situation in Hungary. As it turned out, last Novem- ber she had spoken to Malta- Today – no less – rubbishing criticism from Labour MEPS who alleged that their PN counterparts were raising the issue of rule of law in Malta while closing an eye on what is going on in Hungary. She had pointed out that when the Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, vis- ited the European Parliament, she had explicitly stated that the EPP "will always defend the values (of freedom of speech) whenever and wher- ever they are under threat, whether it is corruption in Malta by the government, the watering down of the rule of law in Romania; institutions under pressure in Poland; or what is happening in Hun- gary." On the 16th July – eight days before my opinion piece was published – Roberta Met- sola, as one of 60 members of the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liber- ties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), voted in favour of the report drawn up by Dutch MEP Judith Sargentini on "the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded." Eight EPP members – amongst whom Metsola – voted for the Sargentini report and nine against it. Of these nine six are Fidesz members who naturally stood by their own party and government; leaving only three non-Hun- garian EPP members who opposed the report. The report outlines concerns about the independence of the judiciary, corruption, freedom of expression, the rights of Roma and Jewish minori- ties and refugees, and other issues. It recommends the launch of the Article 7 process against Hungary, which could ultimately lead to Hungary losing its right to vote on EU decisions. It now goes to the full EU Parliament in Septem- ber. If the European Parlia- ment approves it, the matter would move to the European Council, made up of leaders of the EU's member countries. After the Sargentini report was accepted by the commit- tee, the undersecretary in the Hungarian Prime Minister's office in charge of European Affairs – Judit Varga – wrote an editorial titled 'The des- ecration of the rule of law' in which she claimed that the members of the commit- tee "defied transparency and democracy itself." The report, she argued, is without real legal arguments and political differences are presented as problems concerning the rule of law in Hungary. According to Varga, in their report, the MEPs had encroached on strictly na- tional matters and the whole investigation and report were nothing but a "political witch- hunt." Sounds familiar, doesn't it? We also had the story of a heavy gold chain said to belong to a murder victim that disappeared from the quarter- master stores at the police head- quarters The law courts' 'take-away' Michael Falzon micfal@maltanet.net

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of MaltaToday previous editions - MT 8 July 2018