Issue link: https://maltatoday.uberflip.com/i/614946
25 maltatoday, SUNDAY, 13 DECEMBER 2015 Opinion maltatoday Limiting the powers of government A scandal a day is keeping people away. Away from politics, away from public life, away from civic participation. This is not only unfortunate, but also dangerous. Politics is a force for good if it is built by active civic participation of well-meaning citizens. Worryingly, it is these citizens who are becoming the most disconcerted by the corruption and abuse of power perpetrated by members of the government, and the more such citizens stay away from contributing, the more they make way for others who are more self-serving in their intentions. This will lead to corruption and indecency becoming the order of the day, tumbling in a cancerous downward spiral. The endemic root of the problem in our political system is the "winner-takes-all" mentality ingrained not only in politicians, but also in many sections of the populace. Some still believe that we elect a political party and leader for a five-year monarchical rule, invested with absolute powers over people, authorities, institutions... even the rule of law. Others though, wonder how on earth deals like the Café Premier bailout, the Gaffarena property affair and the Zonqor land grab, can be defined as legal, constitutional and acceptable in any normal, civilised democracy. Over the years we have grown used to reactive bickering between political parties through press releases debating what should be done on a case-by-case basis. Rarely have we seen them engaged in a proper debate on what should be changed at policy, or even constitutional level, not to allow those in power to abuse in the first place. Luckily though, Simon Busuttil is changing the political game and walking the talk on his promise of a new style of doing politics. The document "Restoring Trust in Politics" published by the Nationalist Party last Sunday highlights the real issues, the roots of these problems, and comes up with no fewer than 109 proposals to stop this downward spiral of indecency, hidden deals and abuse of power. More importantly, in a stark contrast to the way Labour is behaving in government, this document is a big step forward in setting more limits on what powers government should have. And it is about time we start to seriously discuss these limits. Because what is the role of government? Why should we accept to have part of our liberty, including part of our hard-earned income, taken away from us and placed in the trust of others? Why shouldn't we allow the free market and competition to settle our trading relationships and economic prosperity? We accept this "necessary evil" for only two reasons. The first is that the free market on its own completely disregards the fact that there are vulnerable members of society, be it for social or economic reasons, who can never compete on an equal footing. They therefore need help and protection. The second reason is that there are certain infrastructural investments which serve the common good, which no private entity or individual would take up were it not for government. A simple example would be the road network, and the administration and protection of public property and heritage. These two reasons are the main scope of government. And its powers should be limited to such. What we have seen in these two years was the complete opposite. We have seen a government which has done away with its supposedly socialist credo, preferring instead to placate business and speculative interests, and which has used public property to serve private interests rather than the common good. On the other hand, it has used its power to influence and take over all regulators, authorities and institutions which are supposed to be keeping it in check, attempting to bully them where the law has stopped it from overtaking them (as is happening regularly in the case of the Ombudsman). It even went as far as to change the law to have its own MPs chairing such regulators in an obvious conflict of interest. This document comes as a breath of fresh air in such a low period of our political history. It is courageous in its proposals, among which the complete and total autonomy of the Public Broadcasting Service on the same model as the BBC, and bold in its declarations. Will Joseph Muscat take up the challenge? My hopes are not too high. Indeed, the first sign that he is not interested in releasing his absolute grip on power was given on Monday, the day after the launch of Busuttil's set of proposals. A smear campaign targeting Busuttil through his driver was staged, based on his €70 weekly fuel consumption. Ironically, this came from a Prime Minister who loans his own used car to himself for more than 7,000 euros annually, and who has steadfastly refused to reduce fuel prices to reflect international prices. This is worrying. Smear campaigns and attacks on the Leader of the Opposition are a common symptom of totalitarian rulers. We are now sure, more than ever, that the next election is not simply going to be about two political manifestos. It is going to be about something much more fundamental than that. Something we have taken for granted since 1987. It is once again going to be about the basics of democracy and liberty. It is going to be about the limits of the government's power on our lives. It is going to be about how free we should feel to speak our minds and criticise those in power without suffering repercussions. And that is the change Simon Busuttil and the Nationalist Party are putting forward for those who want decency, honesty and transparency back at the forefront of politics and public life. I take this opportunity to wish you all the best for the festive season. Mark Anthony Sammut is a PN local councillor for Gudja and a PN candidate successful bidders. It certainly has no business to be intervening in a private dispute. I'd also want to know the precise legal grounds on which the holder of a government lease can be evicted before expiry of said lease, as was clearly the case here. That the rent was not paid would be one valid reason (no indication in the story of whether this is the case). Used for illegal purposes would be another. But to kick out a lessee, for no other apparent reason than because it would benefit a much larger and well-financed corporation… I don't know. Doesn't sound very Socialist to me. Nor very legal, for that matter… Even if it is established that the intervention was warranted and legal: was there no other solution than to simply boot one party out? We are told, for instance, that no offer was made to accommodate the existing stalls within the new plans. Why not? Why deny these tenants the right of first refusal, which is habitually accorded to all tenants every where? The only plausible answer is that this is not any old ordinary takeover scenario, where the normal rules of business engagement apply. This is part of a wider strategy – an official policy, even – to radically alter Valletta's entire identity in time for its celebration as a 'European Capital of Culture' in 2018. And it's not just limited to our friend the butcher. The above story should be familiar for another reason: the exact same pattern is perfectly visible in other parts of Valletta, too. Even in other parts of Merchants Street… Just as our valiant butcher faced his inevitable defeat at the hands of Malta's political/industrial complex, the much-maligned Valletta Monti hawkers were likewise being bundled from one street corner to another, for all the world like a garbage bag no one wants on his doorstep. They've already been given their marching orders from Ordnance Street, because their presence there might upset the grand (and entirely alien) aesthetic vision of a Master Architect for the entrance to Valletta. Now, similar battle-lines are being drawn to deny them relocation further up Merchants Street. Makes you wonder how the street even got its name, if 'merchants' are such vile, leprous beings that their presence cannot be tolerated there at all… There is, in brief, the same sea-change unfolding in the background, as there was in the case of the last 'bidwi' in Wied il-Ghasel. It's not just a story about a traditional butcher evicted by a supermarket chain: it is also a ref lection of a reality that is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. Every where you look, individual (mostly family-run) establishments are being gobbled up by franchises and chains which – even though local (Arcadia first started out in Gozo) – nonetheless owe more in character to the faceless, multi-corporate reality you will find in all developed countries every where, than to the capital whose 'cultural identity' we are supposed to be celebrating in 2018. Part of that same cultural identity also gets booted out with the relocation of that butcher from the old market, and the Monti from Valletta. Even more will be lost with the impending transformation of that market into a sanitised, state-of-the-art shopping centre, which charges 20% of turnover in rent… thus sealing off entry to all but the highest-end of retail outlets, and ridding Valletta once and for all of the entire concept of a 'city market' (which is supposed to cater for everyone). What is that, if not a straight swap between everything that makes Valletta the city it is, and some private investment here and there (7 million, in the case of the market) to transform Valletta into what could just as easily be any other part of Malta... or indeed any other country? It's not so much 'gentrification', as 'Pavi-fication' (Or Lidl-ification, or Smart-ification, or Arcad-ification, if you prefer). Malta is metamorphosing before our eyes into one giant supermarket chain, in which there is no more visible trace of anything that is recognisably ours. And just to add an overwhelming dash of irony to the mix, all this is being perpetrated in the name of 'culture'. To go back to the butcher story: "In 2008, MEPA listed the market as a Grade 1 building and the new project must be completed by 2017, in time for the celebrations marking Valletta's status as European cultural capital in 2018." Yes, that's a great way to celebrate Valletta as a European Cultural Capital in 2018. By cutting the ribbons at the latest Arcadia supermarket: one of only five successful, clinical and largely identical supermarkets already on the island – when we could be celebrating all the life, bustle and culture that actually helped shape Valletta's identity over the past 100 years. Some 'culture' we'll all be celebrating, huh? May as well rename it: "Valletta 2018: European Capital of Corporate Ruthlessness'… Mark Anthony Sammut